![]() |
|
| for more information on this book, click here | Click here for the Intelligent Mind Home page |
| Disk
Storage Unit – 50 years on |
||
|
By
Author
of Computer Storage: a Manager’s
Guide |
||
|
The
IBM 305 RAMAC computer system launched
the disk drive revolution |
||
![]() |
The year is 1956 - mechanical
memory, CRT tubes and capacitive drums are now devices of a bygone era,
whilst punched card, paper tape, magnetic drum stores and magnetic tape are a
familiar sight
within the landscape of computing. What more could you want? What more
could technology possibly offer in terms of data storage? Until
the turn of the 1950’s, it was impossible to imagine what might be
missing from the world of computing. Then, in 1952, IBM embarked upon a
new research & development programme to investigate the concept of a
rotating magnetic disk stack, based on its volumetric efficiency for
recording surface storage. This research was to provide the answer to the
problem of instant ‘filing and finding’ of information and would
revolutionise the computer industry. During
the 1950’s, paper tape systems had an optimum read speed of about 15 cps
(characters per second), whilst drum stores were notorious for
malfunctioning and expensive to maintain. Furthermore, magnetic tape
continued to be a luxury that only national defence programmes could
afford. |
|
|
IBM 350 disk drive Image: IBM Archives |
||
|
On this basis, IBM
set about researching a new I/O device that was economical to build and
maintain, had a scalable volumetric capacity, and would have a relatively
fast random access storage capability. This research was based at 99 Notre
Dame, San Jose, CA, USA, which was to become the birthplace of magnetic
disk storage. On the 4th of September 1956, IBM subsequently
launched the 350 Disk Storage Unit, which was taken to market by the IBM
305 RAMAC (Random Access Method of Accounting and Control) computer
system. IBM would officially announce the 305 RAMAC computing system to
the media on 13th September 1956. |
|
|
Reynold (Rey) Johnson (1906–1998) |
|
|
|
|
|
The introduction of the 350 Disk Storage Unit increased the utility of the IBM 305 RAMAC, as the 350 made it possible for the first time to file, retrieve and manipulate information from database records in ‘real-time’. As such, the 350 Disk Storage Unit became poised to replace punched card as the primary unit record. With the cabinet covers on, the IBM 350 Disk Storage Unit measured 5’ 8” tall, 5’ wide and 2’ 5” deep, whilst it weighed in at massive 250kgs. The unit comprised fifty 24” platters, one pair of read/write heads and a pulley system that provided both the vertical and horizontal head movement. Furthermore, the native storage capacity of the disk drive was 5MB (referred to at the time as 5 million characters). |
|
|
In terms of the platter stack, the media that was adhered to the disk surfaces was just as primitive as the pulley system used to drive the read/write heads. Quite simply, the media consisted of paint that had been refined by squeezing it through women’s stockings, which subsequently had iron filings mixed into it. Initially it proved very challenging to adhere the magnetic paint to the surfaces of the highly-polished disks. Brushing, spraying and dipping techniques were tried, but left areas of bubbling and pitting in the dried surface. Eventually, it was found that the magnetic paint could be poured onto a spinning surface using a device that was similar to a potter’s wheel. As the paint was poured onto the surface of the spinning disk. Forces that were exhibited by the spinning motion of the disk would serve to spread the mixture both outwards and fairly evenly across the surface. This motion meant that the disk was effectively ‘painting itself’. |
|
| The read/write head (pictured right) was constructed as a narrow pole tip element, with a 2 mil tip radius and a 2 mil gap. |
|
|||
| Although the maximum density did not error or otherwise ‘roll off’ until 150 bpi was reached, 100 bpi was implemented in the system. With regard to the encoding technique, ‘self-clocking amplitude’ detection was used. | ||||
|
Once in production, 100's of disks were manufactured and tested with the aid of oscilloscopes |
||||
|
|
|
|
Foreground, two IBM 350 Disk Storage Units in operation |
A
close up look at some of the specifications of the IBM 350 Disk drive
|
|
|
Specifications of IBM 350 disk drive |
|||||
| Platters | Fifty aluminium disks*1 | ||||||
| Platter diameter | 24 inch | ||||||
| Disk thickness | 0.1 inch | ||||||
| Spacing | 0.3 | ||||||
| Height of disk stack | 20 inches | ||||||
| Axis | Vertical | ||||||
| RPM | 1,200 | ||||||
| Media | Iron oxide paint | ||||||
| Storage capacity | 5 million characters | ||||||
| Data transfer rate | 8,800 cps | ||||||
| Concentric tracks | 100 on each side | ||||||
| Bits per inch | 100 | ||||||
| Tracks per inch | 20 | ||||||
| Characters per track | 500 | ||||||
| Density | 100 b/p inch (inside track) | ||||||
| 55 b/p inch (outside track) | |||||||
| Average seek time | 600 milliseconds | ||||||
| Head type | Inductive (includes an erase gap) | ||||||
| Head lift method | Air jet | ||||||
|
Single arm head positioning option |
Dual arm head positioning option |
Head-to-disk spacing | 800 micro inches (25 mm) | ||||
| Air pressure | 50 lbs p/inch2 | ||||||
| Head access mechanisms | Up to 3 (in practice) *2 | ||||||
|
The 350 Disk Storage Unit was also available in a storage capacity of 10 million character capacities*3 |
Annual rent | $38,000 (approx.) | |||||
|
*1 |
Up to 120 disks had been added to the axis (in a horizontal position) during early testing |
|||||
| *2 | An optional enhancement added in 1958 In addition, 1958 saw the enhancement of the 305 RAMAC computer system, enabling it to connect two 350 Disk Storage Units. This increased the utility of the 305 RAMAC system, providing system storage configurations of 5, 10, 15 or 20 million character storage |
|||||
| *3 | Storage capacity was measured using the unit of ‘million characters’, as the 8-bit byte would not come into effect until the introduction of the IBM 360 computer system The character length of the 350 was 6-bit, plus 1 ‘space’ bit |
|||||
| NB: |
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Model | Announced | Withdrawn | ||||
|
September 4th 1956 | August 18th 1969 | ||||
|
May 5th 1958 | August 18th 1969 | ||||
|
September 15th 1958 | August 18th 1969 | ||||
|
January 12th 1959 | August 18th 1969 | ||||
|
The potential of the IBM 350 disk drive was quickly recognized by many computing companies, who set about developing their own disk drives. This development was also embraced by producers of Drum Store peripherals as a means to extend their product offerings. Interestingly, non-computing engineering companies also began to diversify and apply their precision engineering skills to this new hi-tech area. By the early 1970’s, the number of companies involved with the disk drive industry had peaked to over 230. However, with the disk drive industry’s appetite for mergers and acquisitions, this figure has declined significantly, whereby only a handful of companies remain today.
|
|
Interestingly, such a reduction in the number of disk drive companies has had no detriment to the disk drive industry itself. In fact, disk shipment volumes continue to grow, with some analysts predicting that volume sales over the next 5 years will equal that of the past 50 years. This prediction is further echoed by some futurologists, who suggest that the number of hard disk based products per household will average at around 8 ~ 10 by about 2010. Such a trend would follow one that has been enjoyed by the Compact Disc market, whereby the average household has around 9 ~ 11 CD-type devices, ranging from Hi-Fi’s, personal CD players, in-car music systems, game stations, CD-ROMs and DVD players. |
| References: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For more information about Phil Haylor, please visit www.intelligentmind.co.uk | |
|
For further information about the Museum of Computing, please visit www.museum-of-computing.org.uk |
|